BB info
kixtart FAQ (summary & mirror report of 'FAQ' forum (http://kixtart.org))
kixtart UDF (summary & mirror report of 'UDF' forum (http://kixtart.org))
Scriptlogic UDF (summary & mirror report of 'UDF' forum (http://www.scriptlogic.com/kixtart))
BB index (complete forum index of 'http://kixtart.org' site. size about 1.2 MB)
BB specials (summary report of 'http://kixtart.org' members)
BB statistics
BB overview
BB overview details (details per month, per day, per 3-hour and per weekday. based on active posts)
BB history
BB user history
BB top25 part I (per month, no cumulation. based on active posts)
BB top25 part II (per month with cumulation per year. based on active posts)
BB top25 summary
- per year, no cumulation. based on active posts of registered membered.
- also for period 1999..2003 complete reports based on active posts of unregistered and registered members and based on profile
information.
BB mm club (details per month, per 3-hour and per weekday for all members with over 1.000 posts. based on active posts)

Dear,

Indeed people could think in another direction, when we call it "bumping" counter.
Jack returns the exact explanation for it. It is the result of "missing" posts,
but all the feedback shows that choosing a correct name can be very hard. So
"bumping" counter is more than "missing" posts (see later).

Just by choosing our name for it enough people are interesting. At least our input
returns enough positive feedback to get a proper list (see later reactions).

Les, we don't mean any negative with our "bumping" counter. We don't accuses anyone.
To prevent it we will use another name for it. Just adding such list prevents that
other persons must do the calculations which is already possible. All required infor-
mation for our "missing post"-list is already available on our statistical pages
(in our version: only people with over 100 posts can become a member of it).
It was just inspired when Jens and you are trying (at least it looks like a neck-and-neck
race) to get and to keep the second position on our active postcounter lists, but his
speed was already enormous this year.
Inspired, when we see a big differences between the two of you. Of course it doesn't mean,
that "missing"/"deleted" posts aren't relevant contributions.

Jooel, you are right. The missing posts counter is a combination of deleted and bumping
posts. We can't see which of the two was choosing. The problem becomes even harder,
when other people (= moderators can do it with a very good reason) are deleting someone's
posts. Also when we had to deal with the influence of private message's it makes this
issue more complex.
So Jack's suggestion is a very good one.
Of course the postcount must be a relative one. Also a good suggestion.
Since the latest upgrade of our statistical pages we make sometimes some small extensions
to it. For an easier way of reading. For making trends much easier to see.

About a definitive name we find again a new obstacle. The available posts on moderator
forum are inaccessible and invisible for normal members, but we include them in our
"active post counter" lists.
We have the intentsion to can call it the "inaccessible" list.
Other suggestions?
greetings.

users 8.093 (based on profile info 1 October 2003)
posts 102.726
posts sum percent
1 Lonkero 10.488 10.488 10,21%
2 sealeopard 7.039 17.527 17,06%
3 LLigetfa 5.974 23.501 22,88%
4 Shawn 5.328 28.829 28,06%
5 MCA 4.729 33.558 32,67%
6 Howard Bullock 4.102 37.660 36,66%
7 kdyer 3.771 41.431 40,33%
8 Jochen 3.537 44.968 43,77%
9 NTDOC 3.370 48.338 47,06%
10 Radimus 3.251 51.589 50,22%
11 Bryce 2.000 53.589 52,17%
12 Richard H. 1.329 54.918 53,46%
13 Chris S. 1.206 56.124 54,63%
14 cj 982 57.106 55,59%
15 Jack Lothian 979 58.085 56,54%
16 MightyR1 970 59.055 57,49%
17 BrianTX 895 59.950 58,36%
18 DrillSergeant 616 60.566 58,96%
19 kholm 579 61.145 59,52%
20 bleonard 567 61.712 60,07%
21 Waltz 485 62.197 60,55%
22 masken 473 62.670 61,01%
23 Austin 425 63.095 61,42%
24 Alex.H 402 63.497 61,81%
25 DDavidson 379 63.876 62,18%
....
30 Paul_Berquam 285 65.428 63,69%
40 krabourn 198 67.870 66,07%
50 Fuse 168 69.717 67,87%
60 novastar 135 71.245 69,35%
70 Ruud van Velsen 119 72.511 70,59%
80 Kir@ 99 73.594 71,64%
90 Kellar 87 74.519 72,54%
100 brewdude6 75 75.326 73,33%

(info-user) 01373 Co -> CO
(info-user) 01373 Co -> CO
(info-user) 01373 CO -> Co
(info-user) 01373 Co -> CO
(info-user) 01373 CO -> Co
(info-user) 01373 Co -> CO
(info-user) 01373 CO -> Co
(info-user) 01373 CO -> Co
(info-user) 01373 Co -> CO
(info-user) 01373 Co -> CO
(info-user) 01373 CO -> Co
(info-user) 01373 Co -> CO
(info-user) 01373 CO -> Co
(info-user) 01373 CO -> Co
(info-user) 01373 CO -> Co
(info-user) 01373 CO -> Co
(info-user) 01373 Co -> CO
(info-user) 01373 CO -> Co
(info-user) 01373 Co -> CO
(info-user) 01373 Co -> CO
(info-user) 01373 Co -> CO
(info-user) 01373 CO -> Co
(info-user) 01373 CO -> Co
(info-user) 01373 Co -> CO
(info-user) 01373 Co -> CO
(info-user) 01373 CO -> Co
(info-user) 01373 CO -> Co
(info-user) 01373 Co -> CO
(info-user) 01373 Co -> CO
(info-user) 01373 Co -> CO
(info-user) 01373 CO -> Co