#97299 - 2002-12-29 04:07 AM
Once again a slow weekend
|
Howard Bullock
KiX Supporter
   
Registered: 2000-09-15
Posts: 5809
Loc: Harrisburg, PA USA
|
I guess the holiday has everyone a little busy. Where's Lonkero? What happened to Brian? Where is everyone else?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#97301 - 2002-12-29 06:12 AM
Re: Once again a slow weekend
|
NTDOC
Administrator
   
Registered: 2000-07-28
Posts: 11628
Loc: CA
|
I'm lurking a little as well, but not much going on. Been trying to get 2 routers hooked together and working. I need more conections now for home with the XBox and PS2 now wanting connections.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#97302 - 2002-12-30 10:44 PM
Re: Once again a slow weekend
|
Howard Bullock
KiX Supporter
   
Registered: 2000-09-15
Posts: 5809
Loc: Harrisburg, PA USA
|
I guess the weekend continues this week....
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#97304 - 2002-12-30 11:02 PM
Re: Once again a slow weekend
|
Howard Bullock
KiX Supporter
   
Registered: 2000-09-15
Posts: 5809
Loc: Harrisburg, PA USA
|
Yeah. He started on the KixGolf problem then dissappeared.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#97306 - 2002-12-30 11:06 PM
Re: Once again a slow weekend
|
Howard Bullock
KiX Supporter
   
Registered: 2000-09-15
Posts: 5809
Loc: Harrisburg, PA USA
|
Lonkero just appeared on the bbchecker users list.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#97310 - 2002-12-30 11:28 PM
Re: Once again a slow weekend
|
Howard Bullock
KiX Supporter
   
Registered: 2000-09-15
Posts: 5809
Loc: Harrisburg, PA USA
|
Yeah, mine suffers from the dual loops which provide the sorted data which is immediately used to produce the vector. [ 30. December 2002, 23:28: Message edited by: Howard Bullock ]
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#97313 - 2002-12-31 02:15 AM
Re: Once again a slow weekend
|
Howard Bullock
KiX Supporter
   
Registered: 2000-09-15
Posts: 5809
Loc: Harrisburg, PA USA
|
Lonkero, I have a lot more than than 2 hours invested in that code development. I hope it take you a few more before you can find any improvement.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#97317 - 2002-12-31 02:53 AM
Re: Once again a slow weekend
|
Howard Bullock
KiX Supporter
   
Registered: 2000-09-15
Posts: 5809
Loc: Harrisburg, PA USA
|
If you are talking about calling the function more than once in the same script, then the answer is no. I do know that the function name is a global variable and that the way it append data would cause and issue with multiple executions of the function.
Fortunately, the parent test script does not do that. To isolate the variable for reuse will cost a couple strokes.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: Arend_, Allen, Jochen, Radimus, Glenn Barnas, ShaneEP, Ruud van Velsen, Mart
|
1 registered
(Allen)
and 1198 anonymous users online.
|
|
|