#94177 - 2002-10-08 09:06 PM
Re: parallel registry writes
|
Shawn
Administrator
   
Registered: 1999-08-13
Posts: 8611
|
I think there are 1000's of simultaneous registry writes happening all the time anyways under Windows NT - even when your machine is quiet - even while your out in the alley having drinkies with the twins [especially with McAfee running]. Whats another couple hundred going to do ?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#94181 - 2002-10-08 09:33 PM
Re: parallel registry writes
|
NTDOC
Administrator
   
Registered: 2000-07-28
Posts: 11628
Loc: CA
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#94183 - 2002-10-08 11:44 PM
Re: parallel registry writes
|
NTDOC
Administrator
   
Registered: 2000-07-28
Posts: 11628
Loc: CA
|
Okay... here is a little lighter reading (but still technical)
Platform SDK: Windows System Information
Registry Element Size Limits
The following are the size limits for the various registry elements.
The maximum size of a key name is 255 characters. The maximum size of a value name is as follows: Windows XP, Windows .NET Server: 16383 characters Windows 2000: 260 ANSI characters or 16383 Unicode characters. Windows 95/98/Me: 255 characters Long values (more than 2048 bytes) should be stored as files with the file names stored in the registry. This helps the registry perform efficiently. The maximum size of a value is as follows: Windows NT/2000/XP: Available memory. Windows 95/98/Me: 16,300 bytes. There is a 64K limit for the total size of all values of a key.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/sysinfo/base/registry.asp
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/sysinfo/base/registry_storage_space.asp
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#94185 - 2002-10-09 12:17 AM
Re: parallel registry writes
|
NTDOC
Administrator
   
Registered: 2000-07-28
Posts: 11628
Loc: CA
|
Understanding and Configuring Registry Size Limit (RSL)
In a nutshell, I don't think you will corrupt the Registry unless you write TOO much data or INVALID data. If the writes are all performed correctly then I don't think you will have an issue on Windows 2000/XP/.NET
But that is only "my opinion".
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#94190 - 2002-12-11 05:03 AM
Re: parallel registry writes
|
MCA
KiX Supporter
   
Registered: 2000-04-28
Posts: 5152
Loc: Netherlands, EU
|
Lonkero, the only real problem we see what will be the result when different scripts are changing the same registry key with different values. Even when the registry becomes corrupt which happens mostly with a powerdown windows will repair it automatically.
But our question is: - how you can manage 1.000 scripts. - what are the tasks of those 1.000 scripts. We doesn't hope they will run during each logging on on each client. greetings.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#94192 - 2002-12-11 05:15 AM
Re: parallel registry writes
|
MCA
KiX Supporter
   
Registered: 2000-04-28
Posts: 5152
Loc: Netherlands, EU
|
Normally kixtart was using only for logging o tasks. Now your BBChecker is running whole day. The Investor release some other realtime things.
It confirms again that hardly anything can be done with KiXtart. You surely remember the reseller from last week. greetings.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#94194 - 2002-12-11 05:30 AM
Re: parallel registry writes
|
MCA
KiX Supporter
   
Registered: 2000-04-28
Posts: 5152
Loc: Netherlands, EU
|
The only issue can be the differences between compiler and interpreter the execution speed. greetings.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: Arend_, Allen, Jochen, Radimus, Glenn Barnas, ShaneEP, Ruud van Velsen, Mart
|
1 registered
(Allen)
and 1198 anonymous users online.
|
|
|