|
Doc,
In the case of OO code it's only pseudo.
(Also awailable in logonscripts)
Is this more readable:
xl.AddRov($Row)
Than this:
xlAddRov($Row)
I belive that if we (on this board) agree to the . (dot) notation we can add the posibbility to see that a function call is from a collection/class
I belive that the charcter '.' is illegal in varnames, haven't tested
AND by using DIM and GLOBAL you should be able to encapsulate vars in the scope you want.
I really like Redback's comment. Make it easy to start coding, then make it easy to improve.
[ 06. September 2002, 03:12: Message edited by: kholm ]
| 
