#90057 - 2002-12-02 05:39 PM
Re: bbCheckerII 1.6 RC-3
|
Kdyer
KiX Supporter
Registered: 2001-01-03
Posts: 6241
Loc: Tigard, OR
|
Jooel,
Just sitting here doing some work in TOAD (The Oracle Application Development toolkit) and other work-related applications and had the "history" expanded out to review what posts have been submitted to kixtart.org and it is blank (just simply a grey screen).
Windows XP - SP1
BBChecker RC-3
Task Manager shows: quote:
Task Check if a share is mapped to - BBChecker II
Status Not Responding
Thanks,
Kent [ 02. December 2002, 17:41: Message edited by: kdyer ]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#90059 - 2002-12-02 05:54 PM
Re: bbCheckerII 1.6 RC-3
|
Kdyer
KiX Supporter
Registered: 2001-01-03
Posts: 6241
Loc: Tigard, OR
|
Jooel,
> how long it had been running? About 90 minutes
> memory usage? Did not get that one. > what you mean with gray screen, what had a gray screen? The History list in BBChecker was running with it open.
If I looks at memory usage right now.. WKIX32.EXE shows 6904 KB
I go back and had jumped to 6928KB
Now, is 6952 KB..
Time to turn on perfmon..
Kent
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#90061 - 2002-12-02 06:58 PM
Re: bbCheckerII 1.6 RC-3
|
Kdyer
KiX Supporter
Registered: 2001-01-03
Posts: 6241
Loc: Tigard, OR
|
Ok..
Ran Perfmon on the WKIX32.EXE PID and found -
7,725.74 KB to be the average..
This is using - \\systemname\Process(WKIX32)\Working Set
For the Performance Counter.
Thanks,
Kent [ 02. December 2002, 18:58: Message edited by: kdyer ]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#90063 - 2002-12-02 07:20 PM
Re: bbCheckerII 1.6 RC-3
|
Kdyer
KiX Supporter
Registered: 2001-01-03
Posts: 6241
Loc: Tigard, OR
|
It seems to level off..
However.. Why is it that you are seeing about 4.5 MB and I am that much greater in usage?
Kent
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: Shawn, ShaneEP, Ruud van Velsen, Arend_, Jochen, Radimus, Glenn Barnas, Allen, Mart
|
0 registered
and 980 anonymous users online.
|
|
|