Hey Lonkero,
I'd like to continue the discussion on the not-for-profit concept...Indeed, ScriptLogic corporation is a for-profit company, and the only company to have developed a commercial product based on the wonderful KiXtart language.
The KiXtart Resource center, located at sriptlogic.com is free. It was developed to benefit the entire KiXtart community and no proceeds are sought after.
The UDFs published at our site are public domain and are also free of charge.
Given that we are a well established 3-year old company, and have nearly a million desktops using ScriptLogic every day, we are 100% committed to the success of our product and to the continued success and support of KiXtart, the language our flagship product is based on.
Obviously, maintaining any successful site requires time. Time = expense. This site is maintained well, given a part-time effort and no funding. We have even spoken to Henri (albeit briefly) about combining efforts and co-developing a single worldwide site for the continued support of KiXtart. You and everyone here that contibutes to the forums (here and elsewhere) are part of KiXtart's success.
When scriptlogic.com first introduced the beta and suggestion forums for KiXtart 2001, it was not to take away from this site, but rather to do something unique. Within a short time after our KiXtart Resource Center went live with these unique forums, they were added here...
The goal was not for competing sites, but rather toward the benefit to the community. Unfortunately now Ruud has a minimum of two site he needs to monitor...
This (KiXtart.org) is a wonderful site - the talent that posts here is what makes it a success! Without a doubt, there is room in this world for a few sites, provided they all benefit the KiXtart community.
Without getting defensive, might I question why the UDFs should be published somewhere else?
What drawbacks do you see keeping the "Function Library" where it is? What suggestions do you have for moving it and/or making it better? (we're all ears).
Looking forward to your reply,
Brian