ok, so...
your goal mostlikely is with enumgroup.

anyway, does the class names have anything to do with the groupnames?

if not, you will still need to use for simpicity's sake the ingroup.

or just write a ini-file with the group names as valuenames and share to map as valuedata.

this way you can do all the stuff in one loop with ingroup...

anyway, it's a little simpler if you have class groups named so they can be identified to some class' share.
the best would be a group named same as the class' share.

{edit}
btw, we all have known uttleast one PHB in our lifes. not bad. as we just keep our minds focused on DNRC [Big Grin]

[ 22. August 2002, 00:37: Message edited by: Lonkero ]
_________________________
!

download KiXnet