Guys,

A couple of ammendments maybe ...

1) If we were to add "Windows 2000 Readiness" into the mix, I'd give the edge to WSH on this one. Not that WSH has any extra builtin support for Win2K. Only because WSH is more OLE mature than KiXtart is and COM is an important ingredient in Windows 2000 domain work... this will change with KiXtart version 4.0

2) I'm thinking we should down-grade WSH's score in the RELIABILITY category. WSH is prone to VIRUS attacks and this is obviously a bad thing - especially when it's used as a logon script processor (where the script gets "run" daily)...

-Shawn