Sent it on friday i think ... i only have till tomorrow to hear from him , then it resorts to the old NO Info. for the description its no big deal apparetly many others have this problem
jogging, I have no idea of the questions. as I know kix has runtime stack (which was improved lately) but what does your teacher mean by those? there is no real question on the table.
then about brian, someone could indeed ask from brian styles (lastname correct?) firstname.lastname@scriptlogic.com would be the address.
#32708 - 2002-11-2402:06 AMRe: KIX INFO AND HELP !!!!!
JoseJose
Seasoned Scripter
Registered: 2001-04-04
Posts: 693
Loc: Buenos Aires - Argentina
Dont get married. You will have to put a lot of yourself to fell confortable with the language this fellows you are talking with almoust fly. My advice. Stretch your time, sit down, read the manual and practice a lot.
#32709 - 2002-12-0810:10 PMRe: KIX INFO AND HELP !!!!!
MCAMCA
KiX Supporter
Registered: 2000-04-28
Posts: 5152
Loc: Netherlands, EU
Dear,
Also a welcome to the board.
It is a pity we couldn't read projectindex.htm. Possible it is gone. A pity because we find f.e. the four questions very strange questions.
quote: ACTIVATION RECORDS = Title of section 1- run-time stack? 2- AR record format 3- scoping implementation 4- blocks implementation
Reason: who cares what f.e. the AR record format is for a compiler. The compiler only needs to follow the syntax definitions. Only once our organization want to exactly how a part of code is working. It had to deal with the way of "how the system handles LONG REALs". Was it truncating or rounding.
Please can you send me a copy of it. We are very interesting in it.
Also it is very strange when someone gives you KiXtart 3.51 documentation for comparison. For language comparison there are an enormous amount of program language available. Some for administrator tasks and other for precision.
In our opinion education should support you in the future. Supporting someone hobby can't be a goal. greetings.
