RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing - KiXtart.org - official site

You are not logged in. [Log In] KiXtart.org website » Forums » KiXtart » Basic Scripting » RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing

Page 3 of 3

3

Topic Options

#209809 - 2015-01-09 04:36 PM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: Jochen]
Allen Allen KiX Supporter Registered: 2003-04-19 Posts: 4549 Loc: USA	Ha... was fixing it as you were replying $\:\)$
Top

#209810 - 2015-01-09 04:41 PM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: Allen]
Jochen Jochen KiX Supporter Registered: 2000-03-17 Posts: 6380 Loc: Stuttgart, Germany	$\:D$ _________________________
Top

#209811 - 2015-01-09 04:43 PM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: Jochen]
Jochen Jochen KiX Supporter Registered: 2000-03-17 Posts: 6380 Loc: Stuttgart, Germany	Ok, good work there Allan, thanx a bunch. I'll let you know our results running from a GPO.. _________________________
Top

#209812 - 2015-01-09 04:59 PM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: Jochen]
Allen Allen KiX Supporter Registered: 2003-04-19 Posts: 4549 Loc: USA	That code just above reintroduced that $exist bug... fixed the post.
Top

#209813 - 2015-01-09 07:41 PM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: Allen]
Jochen Jochen KiX Supporter Registered: 2000-03-17 Posts: 6380 Loc: Stuttgart, Germany	just wondering, maybe exploring later on: Would this work also remotely? Ah the possibilities. _________________________
Top

#209814 - 2015-01-09 07:45 PM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: Jochen]
Allen Allen KiX Supporter Registered: 2003-04-19 Posts: 4549 Loc: USA	I would say YES... http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa383451%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
Top

#209815 - 2015-01-12 08:42 AM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: Allen]
Jochen Jochen KiX Supporter Registered: 2000-03-17 Posts: 6380 Loc: Stuttgart, Germany	That was fast $;\)$ _________________________
Top

#209878 - 2015-01-26 01:22 AM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: Jochen]
Allen Allen KiX Supporter Registered: 2003-04-19 Posts: 4549 Loc: USA	J, you think this thing is ready for posting to the UDFs?
Top

#209879 - 2015-01-26 09:20 AM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: Allen]
Jochen Jochen KiX Supporter Registered: 2000-03-17 Posts: 6380 Loc: Stuttgart, Germany	oi Allen, as things usually work, my priorities have changed. Don't give up, I'll let you know _________________________
Top

#209896 - 2015-01-30 01:27 PM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: Jochen]
Jochen Jochen KiX Supporter Registered: 2000-03-17 Posts: 6380 Loc: Stuttgart, Germany	Hi Allen, I can confirm that the udf works as gpo script in a 2k8 R2 domain in ~~mixed~~ native mode. We tested it to be run asynchronously but not yet synchroneously (as we don't have to as of now). And it works as advertised On a sidenote: We had to pass wkix32.exe kixtart.kix to get it to work, which is kinda odd. Edited by Jochen (2015-01-30 01:30 PM) Edit Reason: blargh _________________________
Top

#209898 - 2015-01-30 09:33 PM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: Jochen]
NTDOC NTDOC Administrator Registered: 2000-07-28 Posts: 11624 Loc: CA	What... no 2012 R2 native domain? LOL
Top

#209906 - 2015-02-04 06:00 PM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: NTDOC]
Jochen Jochen KiX Supporter Registered: 2000-03-17 Posts: 6380 Loc: Stuttgart, Germany	Oi Ron, seems to be the case, yes ... irdc Apart from that Allens function does work (see last post on page 2) _________________________
Top

#209935 - 2015-02-07 04:39 PM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: Jochen]
Allen Allen KiX Supporter Registered: 2003-04-19 Posts: 4549 Loc: USA	Thanks Jochen for the feedback. I'll post it up to the UDFs soon. In the header I would like to include an example of how it is used in a GPO script. Did you do anything different than the normal (%Scriptdir%\kix.exe,Scriptname.kix)?
Top

#209937 - 2015-02-09 06:56 PM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: Allen]
Jochen Jochen KiX Supporter Registered: 2000-03-17 Posts: 6380 Loc: Stuttgart, Germany	Hi Allen, as our AD guy is on a 4 week vacation in the states, and none of the others is involved in that, I'll have to verify myself. If time allows, I'll post you an update on this soon, this week, probably even.. Yes! _________________________
Top

#210029 - 2015-03-03 04:43 PM Re: RunAsInteractiveUser / LaunchApp.wsf Conversion Testing [Re: Jochen]
Jochen Jochen KiX Supporter Registered: 2000-03-17 Posts: 6380 Loc: Stuttgart, Germany	Oi Allen, been a long time, but fear not, I shan't forget thee! Ok, he tested successfully as GPO script ...\sysvol\blah\etc.. : Seems odd, but he did not manage to get it to run without the script parameter, so he had to make it as stated: wkix32 kixtart.kix oh yeah, and as already stated on page 2 of this thread it runs asynchroneously (which is totally ok for our needs) Anything else? _________________________
Top

Page 3 of 3

3

Previous Topic

Previous Topic View All Topics

View All Topics

Index Next Topic

Next Topic

Moderator: Jochen, Allen, Radimus, Glenn Barnas, ShaneEP, Ruud van Velsen, Arend_, Mart

Hop to:

Shout Box

Who's Online

0 registered and 700 anonymous users online.

Newest Members

Timothy, Jojo67, MaikSimon, kvn317, kixtarts2025
17874 Registered Users

Generated in 0.07 seconds in which 0.026 seconds were spent on a total of 13 queries. Zlib compression enabled.

click tracking