using run() instead of shell() in startup scripts (with robocopy) - KiXtart.org - official site

You are not logged in. [Log In] KiXtart.org website » Forums » KiXtart » Basic Scripting » using run() instead of shell() in startup scripts (with robocopy)

Page 1 of 1

1

Topic Options

#193831 - 2009-05-13 09:15 PM Re: using run() instead of shell() in startup scripts (with robocopy) [Re: Tomarse]
Allen Allen KiX Supporter Registered: 2003-04-19 Posts: 4572 Loc: USA	I've never used a startup script, only logon scripts... so this setting may or may not having any relevance. Windows XP Professional Fast Logon Optimization http://www.kixtart.org/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=112428#Post112428 _________________________ (... better days ahead)
Top

Page 1 of 1

1

Previous Topic

Previous Topic View All Topics

View All Topics

Index Next Topic

Next Topic

Entire topic
Subject	Posted by	Posted
using run() instead of shell() in startup scripts (with robocopy)	Tomarse	2009-05-11 07:45 PM
Re: using run() instead of shell() in startup scripts (with robocopy)	NTDOC	2009-05-11 08:49 PM
Re: using run() instead of shell() in startup scripts (with robocopy)	Tomarse	2009-05-13 07:49 PM
Re: using run() instead of shell() in startup scripts (with robocopy)	Allen	2009-05-13 09:15 PM

Moderator: Jochen, Allen, Radimus, Glenn Barnas, ShaneEP, Ruud van Velsen, Arend_, Mart

Hop to:

Shout Box

Who's Online

0 registered and 2220 anonymous users online.

Newest Members

Viginette, ManuvdWielNL, Sir_Barrington, batdk82, StuTheCoder
17888 Registered Users

Generated in 0.062 seconds in which 0.033 seconds were spent on a total of 14 queries. Zlib compression enabled.

click tracking