Another good something to take away from all of this is that most media is biased; they're only going to show you what they want you to see. They might've interviewed 50 people but they only showed you the biggest of the dipshits that they found. I could've told you where each one of those countries existed on a map right down to Sri Lanka yet, you won't see me or anyone else pointing out the correct information on a news cast like that.

Case and point with the "unbiased" opinion issue (and I'm going to pre-apologize for the rest of the world's citizens as this is a US issue) but the immigration problem we're having is totally one-sided in the news. All you see on the major news networks are the protests BY the illegal immigrants and never the other side of the coin. i have no problem with people going where they please but me as a tax-paying American, would like to believe that my tax dollars are helping OTHER tax-paying Americans and not people who work for a fraction of what they should (in the US) and STILL get coverage for medical bills, use the roads and services that tax-payers $$ pay for, etc. but you don't see my side of the argument in any interviews or anything like that. I mean, I'm in Iraq right now fighting a war on the personal belief that I'm doing the right thing because a genocidal maniac is out of power. Now my justifications may not be the US's reasons for being here but it's what I tell myself so I can sleep at night. =P

As far as my personal answer to the reporter's question: While I don't think we should attack whole countries for terrorism, I think Iran is the most likely "next target". And Iran would be either in the red zone or in the water between "Yurop" and the red zone on Jochen's map. =P