#117962 - 2004-04-16 02:42 PM
Re: execution time
|
burnsc
Starting to like KiXtart
Registered: 2004-04-14
Posts: 171
|
One other Question(for my own clarification). When exactly does this prefetch occur? Before Script Runs At the point in the script where InGroup function is, but once per script(unless cache is older than specified)?
Thanks
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#117963 - 2004-04-16 02:48 PM
Re: execution time
|
Kdyer
KiX Supporter
Registered: 2001-01-03
Posts: 6241
Loc: Tigard, OR
|
Can you clarify "Prefetch?" Are you talking about Token Caching with KiXtart? Or, are you talking about Prefetch from XP, for example?
If I go to Start/Run and type in Prefetch.. I see the programs that have been run. Prefetch tries to capture how programs are executed so that they attempt to run more efficiently. Have you dug around on http://msdn.microsoft.com for Prefetch and it's technology?
Thanks,
Kent
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#117964 - 2004-04-16 02:51 PM
Re: execution time
|
burnsc
Starting to like KiXtart
Registered: 2004-04-14
Posts: 171
|
This is the InGroup token cacheing.
Thanks for the xp tip though. Yet another nice tool to know about
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#117965 - 2004-04-16 02:55 PM
Re: execution time
|
Kdyer
KiX Supporter
Registered: 2001-01-03
Posts: 6241
Loc: Tigard, OR
|
If we dig into the manual from KiXtart. It is on pp. 19-20 of the 4.22 version.
Kent
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#117967 - 2004-04-16 03:25 PM
Re: execution time
|
burnsc
Starting to like KiXtart
Registered: 2004-04-14
Posts: 171
|
This was not definitive enough for my implementations. "This group is filled once every kixstart session" does not tell me when during that session it is created. If 2 programs use this cache, and they run asynchronously it is very easy to have 'race' conditions.
Granted I am being more picky than an average user about this, but I am looking to use this cache as a resource for another program I am writeing too.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#117968 - 2004-04-16 03:28 PM
Re: execution time
|
burnsc
Starting to like KiXtart
Registered: 2004-04-14
Posts: 171
|
Thanks for the information.
I think it is more vague than misleading. But, for most 'normal' implentations this is enough.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#117970 - 2004-04-16 03:44 PM
Re: execution time
|
burnsc
Starting to like KiXtart
Registered: 2004-04-14
Posts: 171
|
My primary reason for that question was not as much control as it was to avoid the 'trial and error' work that someone had already done. It also adds information for the support spectrum of the program. Thanks for the links, I am sure they will help.
On the protocol setup, I am going to try to have one of my test machines available in a few days to try those kinds of setups, but unfortunately they are tied up with other projects at this exact moment.
Thanks for all the help.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#117972 - 2004-04-16 04:37 PM
Re: execution time
|
burnsc
Starting to like KiXtart
Registered: 2004-04-14
Posts: 171
|
I can run the timing script that was given. It produces no errors in the event log. That script contains no @ macros that I can tell. But then neither does my logon script. Unless something is triggered in the InGroup commands processing.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: Jochen, Allen, Radimus, Glenn Barnas, ShaneEP, Ruud van Velsen, Arend_, Mart
|
0 registered
and 686 anonymous users online.
|
|
|