Quote:

---

ok, I think KX was not screwed up.

anyways, I fixed the assocs, opened up kixtarter to edit an udf.
just went to settings and changed the colors a bit.
then closed kixtarter without saving the udf and realized, my kix-assocs were gone, again.

---

Quote:

---

they have never been checked.
that's the problem.

---

Quote:

---

k, now we are talking.
when you do that, I might even try experimenting with it

---

O.k....best I can do for now is this: If you close the settings screen I only mess with the associations if I'm already the default in there. If you add me I make me the default and keep track of the old default. If you then remove me I put the last one that was back in.

On the plus side I think I've found a decent block of code to do a HTML export. I'm almost done cleaning it up. My test code, which clocks in at 45k, exports to HTML at 210k with full font size, color, and type support or 150k for just color support. I guess thats pretty decent. Heres a block exported:

If Val(@KIX) >= 4
    $Inventory = '\\' + $myresourceserver + '\logon\Inv\' + @WKSTA + '.HTM'
    If Exist($Inventory)
        ? "Inventory file exists on server. Not running inventory scripts."
    Else
        ? "Running PC Inventory"
        Call '\\' + $myresourceserver + '\logon\COMPINFO2.KIX'
    EndIf
Else
    ? "Kixtart version is less then 4. Can't run inventory yet."
EndIf


Nifty stuff. Now I'm debating the use of right clicking a section of text and being able to automagically copy whats selected to the clipboard as HTML for easy posting. Would that be something useful?

On another note thanks to those that are beta testing the software. 2.99 is up and pretty stable and I've gotten a couple notes on things to look at. Its very helpful, plesae keep it up.

-Allan

Quote:

---

Nifty stuff. Now I'm debating the use of right clicking a section of text and being able to automagically copy whats selected to the clipboard as HTML for easy posting. Would that be something useful?

---

Quote:

---

Yap. That would be pretty cool. If you could wrap the code in a table with a background color too, that would be pretty handy.

---

Quote:

---

ja, bgcolor is handy specially on this board, even if it is just white.
and allan, I still would like you to call it 3.0 beta
2.99 is version 2.xx and you are doing 3.xx code, no?

---

Quote:

---

ja, I remember you always have had another way of thinking versioning as I

what comes to the table thing...
well, perhaps not table.
simple

should do...
for most of us

---

Quote:

---

Hmmm.. Sounds pretty good then Allan. I've not tested/run your editor for well over a year now as it was just way too buggy to even consider further testing.

I'll give it another try some time this week and see how far along you've come now as it sounds like I should not expect too many issues judging from the postings of others as well.

---

It wasn't buggy. It had unexpected features.

Quote:

---

allan, sure it works.
one can always wonder why one uses table at all when he does not want to present a table.
but, it's your editor and so it's your choice.

---

123
213
321